In Wetumpka, AL

The Wayback Machine will show this site is an investigation of Subliminal Distraction begun in 2002.

If you wish to help in this project, send the Home page URL to your email list and encourage everyone to do the same.

Preventing Subliminal Distraction episodes, mistaken for mental illness, is simple and free.


Copyright 2003   Edit   May 15, 2017

Copyright    Contact page    Demonstration of subliminal sight

If  you  reached this page from a search engine enter the site here,

or see other cases on the Disappearance and College Suicides pages.



Global Warming Theory

There is no doubt that climate changes.

Yes, we may be in a climbing period in that change.

But the prophecies of alarmists have not happened over more than a decade.  


Visual Subliminal Distraction


Follow the Money     The 97% Consensus         Peer Review               The Variables


The links above skip the introduction and site links beginning next.
They all remain on this page.

If this is your first visit to this project....

 Visual subliminal distraction is a normal feature of everyone's physiology of sight.

It was discovered when it caused panicked episodes of confusion for business office knowledge workers.

Those engineers did not understand what they had found.

This site gathers evidence to show many outcomes of chronic exposure other than a panicked episode of confusion.

This is the feature of our physiology that allows QiGong acolytes to believe waving your arms, and legs in unison with small groups of meditating people controls supernatural forces that created and maintain the Universe.

QiGong & Kundalini Yoga

It allows acolytes of Transcendental Meditation to believe

"The Extended Maharishi Effect" can alter thought in a local area, or world wide. 


In the altered mental state from chronic Subliminal Distraction, levitation is accepted as possible.

It creates Radicalization making Jihadists wish to martyr them selves in service to Allah.


Academics take no precaution for visual subliminal distraction where they study, perform research, or create studies.


A small number of academics have serious problems with their critical thinking 

caused by a problem of the physiology of human sight,

              discovered to cause still-believed-harmless mental breaks fifty years ago.


Bart Simson

Proponents of Global Warming cling to beliefs despite current evidence of prediction failure

Competing scientists, and their studies have been suppressed.

The failure of the tree ring proxy was denied, covered up.

When sea temperature measurements denied warming,

they were recalculated until they agreed with the desired political conclusion,

just in time for the Paris accord meeting.


Even then the sea temperature rise they claim is within the error of measurement and calculation.


Peer review is claimed to verify the accuracy, and conclusions of climate studies.

Instead it is used by journal editors to determine the suitability of a paper for publication.

Nothing in peer review determines the accuracy, quality of methodology, or factual conclusions of a study.

Often peer reviewed papers are challenged, or refuted by other work.


The 97% concurrence of scientific papers with human caused warming has been challenged.

Essentially the 'weight of opinion' is substituted for scientific evidence.

The psychiatric effect of Subliminal Distraction can be experimentally proven.  Here

If you found this page from a search engine, or clicked the "Email Responder" link  before reading the introduction,  

                                   visual subliminal distraction is explained in five short sequential text pages.                             

Subliminal Distraction explained.


It is not necessary for all such inclined scientists to have Subliminal Distraction exposure.

All that is required is for enough of the people leading the Global Warming Cult charge-over-the-top assault

to have enough exposure to subtly alter their ability to think, and make critical judgments.

Earth's global weather and seasonal changes have enough stresses that they cannot be reduced to a predictable equation.

 So why do intelligent people attempt to construct a model which will correctly predict the entire Earth's climate changes for years in the future?




                                    Visual subliminal distraction cannot be consciously experienced as it happens.                      

Subjects which create the "mental break causing design mistake" discovered in 1964,

while they concentrate to perform knowledge work, or use a computer

 will have their thoughts subtly altered, shaped by the psychiatric effect

of a massive number of failed, undetectable attempts

to execute the vision startle reflex, stimulating the amygdala.


Subliminal Operant Conditioning


It is not known which authors have this problem. 

But considering the number of student, and faculty psychiatric problems, and suicides,

                                                                                   it cannot be excluded as the cause of the adherence to beliefs which defy proof.                        

 Disappearances   Suicides


Understand, 'Subliminal Distraction' is not a theory, speculation, or an Internet hoax.


It is explained in first semester psychology lectures about how peripheral vision reflexes

are created in the mind below thought, reason, and consciousness.


But the  mental break is rarely mentioned.

All my 1990's instructor said was."Subliminal sight caused a problem in the early days of modern office design."




The office cubicle was created to block peripheral vision to stop it by 1968.

Still a problem, today open plan offices use 'Systems Furniture'

designed so that no one sits, creates distracting movement in another worker's peripheral vision.



So few people are aware of it that there are no papers, or studies about it.

Engineers have successfully prevented what they see and believe is a harmless temporary episode

of psychotic-like confusion,  just a nuisance problem

in the correct design of office workspace, using the cubicle, since 1968.



What is not understood about visual subliminal distraction is that,

although discovered, and solved before they existed,

computers allow anyone to make the office workstation design mistake engineers discovered.


This migrates the office design problem, allows it to be created, in homes, dorm rooms, and student apartments.

Students, academics, home computer users, video game players, and small business office workers are not warned.


Investigation Methodology 

Academics, climate scientists, and Global Warming activists are unaware of a problem with the physiology of sight.

They do not know to take precautions for chronic low level Subliminal Distraction exposure, "peripheral vision blocking protection,"

when performing long hours of concentration to work with threat-movement detectable in peripheral vision.

By investigating activities which have the "special circumstances" for Subliminal Distraction,

and which cause mental events, it is possible to show fear, paranoia, panic, anxiety, depression,

                                                     and thoughts of suicide are other outcomes even when exposure is too low to cause the full mental break.                   Site Outline page

Those subconscious stresses from the oppressive subliminal appreciation of threat, 

                                                                                      acting in the mind below thought reason, and consciousness, shape thought with chronic exposure.                    Subliminal Operant Conditioning page

This effects the ability to think, and reason critically.

It would explain efforts to ban other investigator's studies from publication;

refusing to acknowledge the failure of the tree ring proxy;

cherry picking between data sets, discounting data which disagree with their conclusions.


Design engineers eschew discussing it.

They don't want to make the career ending mistake

                                               of releasing information which will start a flood of litigation.              Info refusal in 2002

When my wife had a psychotic break after her office was changed eliminating Cubicle Level Protection,

I discovered the public, mental health services, and research

are unaware engineers discovered, and solved believed-harmless mental breaks using the cubicle by 1968.

                        I had learned of it as a 22 year old engineering student in 1966, But I had never see it happen before.                    

See Connie's page on site.

Safely experience how Subliminal Distraction begins

by performing my demonstration of the habituation of conscious sight in peripheral vision.   Demo.






The "mental break causing design mistake" is a physical situation. 

It can be copied, optimized, then with necessary precautions,

shown to cause anxiety, and depressive ideation,

long before the full office worker mental break would happen.


Yes, it is possible  to create depression experimentally.

By investigating activities which have mental breaks associated with them,

and which create the "special circumstances" for  Subliminal Distraction,

it is possible to determine other psychiatric symptoms from Subliminal Distraction.

There are 2,400, and 3,000 years respectivly, experience with mental breaks

from QiGong and Kundalini Yoga exercises.   Here



The Site Outline page has my investigation methodology

shows other places the mental events have happened today,

and gives two places the problem can be verified, believed harmless. 




Follow the Money


Under Construction


At the time of Vice President Al Gore's documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth." he  was involved in a plan to broker carbon credits. 

His detractors said it would have made him a billionaire.

His documentary was banned in British schools unless appropriate materials

were also provided to students so they could understand the debate.

  Courts there deemed it as a political presentation.














































The 97 % Concurrence

Under Construction

The 97% Concurrence study has been cited in debates. 

Bernie Sanders cited it in a recent speech.

A hacker broke into the study author's  Australian School computer to get a full copy of his work.

This revealed the methodology and the true statistics.

The concurrence is for a small number of 11,000 papers he surveyed.

Critics say the concurrence is closer to 3% of 11,000 papers.

In the original study key words in the abstract were used to conclude concurrence.

The text, and subject matter of the paper was not involved.

There is an  ongoing debate on this study,

Google it to read both sides of the debate.


















Peer Review



Today, July 23, 2017 a new absurd peer reviewed psychology paper hoax was revealed.

Using the names 'Dr. Lucas McGeorge' and 'Dr. Annette Kin'

for George Lucas, and Anakin Skywalker, (Darth Vader), with the plot for a Star Wars story,

the nonsense paper was published.


"Mitochondria: Structure, Function and Clinical Relevance"

was deliberately written with false ridiculous information, and movie quotes from the Star Wars series.

The paper explains "midi-chlorians" a fictional entity which live inside the body cells of Jedi,

giving the "Knights" their supernatural powers.


Text false paper

Submitted to nine journals it was accepted by three.


Hoax Number 2


While preparing material for this segment a new story has been reported that two American  academics wrote a hoax paper "The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct."

The nonsense paper was peer reviewed and published.

The conceptual penis as a social construct
Jamie Lindsay and Peter Boyle

Anatomical penises may exist, but as pre-operative transgendered women also have anatomical penises, the penis vis-à-vis maleness is an incoherent construct. We argue that the conceptual penis is better understood not as an anatomical organ but as a social construct isomorphic to performative toxic masculinity.
Through detailed poststructuralist discursive criticism and the example of climate change, this paper will challenge the prevailing and damaging social trope that
penises are best understood as the male sexual organ and reassign it a more fitting role as a type of masculine performance.


Complaints from academia are that this paper was published in a "vanity journal."

There are other papers which have been written, peer reviewed,

and published which detractors cite as  the problem with peer review.




Number 3

This next paper is cited as valid, but has been argued as suspect.

Glaciers, gender, and science
A feminist glaciology framework for global environmental change research
Mark Carey, M. Jackson, Alessandro Antonello, ...
First Published January 10, 2016


Glaciers are key icons of climate change and global environmental change. However, the relationships among gender, science, and glaciers – particularly related to epistemological questions about the production of glaciological knowledge – remain understudied. This paper thus proposes a feminist glaciology framework with four key components: 1) knowledge producers; (2) gendered science and knowledge; (3) systems of scientific domination; and (4) alternative representations of glaciers. Merging feminist postcolonial science studies and feminist political ecology, the feminist glaciology framework generates robust analysis of gender, power, and epistemologies in dynamic social-ecological systems, thereby leading to more just and equitable science and human-ice interactions.

Paper  (Off site link)



Hoax  Number 4


The Sokal Affair

Dr. Alan D.Sokal, Department of Physics, New York University  wrote a paper of nonsense phrases. 

It was published November 28, 1994.


"Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity"

There are many natural scientists, and especially physicists, who continue to reject the notion that the disciplines concerned with social and cultural criticism can have anything to contribute, except perhaps peripherally, to their research. Still less are they receptive to the idea that the very foundations of their worldview must be revised or rebuilt in the light of such criticism. Rather, they cling to the dogma imposed by the long post-Enlightenment hegemony over the Western intellectual outlook, which can be summarized briefly as follows: that there exists an external world, whose properties are independent of any individual human being and indeed of humanity as a whole; that these properties are encoded in ``eternal'' physical laws; and that human beings can obtain reliable, albeit imperfect and tentative, knowledge of these laws by hewing to the ``objective'' procedures and epistemological strictures prescribed by the (so-called) scientific method.

Dr Sokal said he wrote the paper to test the intellectual rigor of journals.

 The question proposed was would the nonsense paper be published if it just "sounded good and flattered the editors' thinking, and  ideological preconceptions."

The journal did not use peer review outside their staff.

Paper   (NYU Text, off site link.)














Synonyms: factor, element, ingredient, quantity, unknown quantity, condition
Mathematics: A quantity that during a calculation is assumed, but may be assigned different values.
Computing: A data item that may take on more than one value in a program, or simulation.

Here: The input from measurements, and the factors used to compute the prediction of Climate Change.


In temperature measurements these variables will be factors that effect the accuracy of measurement

as well as the outcome derived from that measurement.


Trade or seasonal winds, ocean currents, large cities - nearby to the collection site-  which serve as heat gathers,

plus the nature of the measuring devices are all variables in the computation of climate change.



These artifices are touted as scientific methods.

The adjustment factors are assigned values to "correct" the temperature measurement.

But the temperature measurements they return are calculated, not direct measurements.


The mistake made is to assume a scientist has correctly used the factors, and has accounted for all of them.

Adjusting, changing the input data until the model predicts temperature rise is not science.

The model for global temperature must demonstrate it correctly predicted what happened in reality.



The failure of predictions is evidence of incorrect methods.

Science must match reality.

Global Warming theory, and predictions do not do that.


Why not?


The model is adjusted until the  desired politically correct warming prediction is achieved.


Claims are made for factors which "hide" warming.


Variables are changed to cover up failure.


Consensus of opinion is not science.

Near the turn of the 20th century it was the consensus of opinion that man would never fly

using heavier than air craft  until two bicycle mechanics named Wilbur and Orville proved them wrong.